<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- generator="FireBoard 1.0.5RC2"> -->
<rss version="0.91">
    <channel>
        <title>Monolix - Forum</title>
        <description>FireBoard Site Syndication</description>
        <link>http://software.monolix.org/sdoms/software</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 08:05:07 +0200</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FireBoard 1.0.5RC2</generator>
        
        <item>
            <title>Subject: log-normal distribution of parameters - by: bkoplowitz</title>
            <link>http://software.monolix.org/sdoms/software/index.php?/Forum/Category-32/791-log-normal-distribution-of-parameters.html#793</link>
            <description>Hi Obelix,

The following article may be of help.

Title: Common noncompartmental pharmacokinetic variables: are they normally or log-normally distributed?  

Authors: L. F. Laceya; O. N. Keeneb; J. F. Pritchardc; A. Byea

Published in:  Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, Volume 7, Issue 1 1997 , pages 171 – 178


Abstract 
We investigated the hypothesis that distributions of continuous pharmacokinetic variables are positively skewed in nature and that logarithmic transformation of these variables restores normality. The distributions of common continuous noncompartmental pharmacokinetic variables were investigated for four different Glaxo Wellcome compounds, administered by three different routes of administration: ranitidine (po), sumatriptan (sc), ondansetron (iv), and bismuth, from ranitidine bismuth citrate (po). The distributions of all the investigated noncompartmental pharmacokinetic variables were adequately described by a log-normal distribution, whereas statistically significant departures from normality occurred in the majority of cases. Thus, unless there is strong and consistent evidence for a departure from log-normality, the parametric statistical analysis of common noncompartmental pharmacokinetic variables should be carried out a priori log transformation.


Link: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a776178751~frm=titlelink

All the best,
Barry</description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 22:13:50 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Subject: modeling data on the natural log scale - by: santosh</title>
            <link>http://software.monolix.org/sdoms/software/index.php?/Forum/Category-26/384-modeling-data-on-the-natural-log-scale.html#792</link>
            <description>I was wondering where I can find examples of writing residual error model for log transformed data
e.g. log(Y) = log(F)+W*EPS(1)

Thanks..
Santosh</description>
            <pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 08:17:01 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Subject: Covariate picture - weight depending on time - by: Obelix</title>
            <link>http://software.monolix.org/sdoms/software/index.php?/Forum/Category-40/785-Covariate-picture-weight-depending-on-time.html#790</link>
            <description>Thank you Hector

I guess I understood your answer. Maybe I came back with some further question in the next days.</description>
            <pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 00:20:52 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Subject: Installation on OS X and Matlab2009b - by: jeal2</title>
            <link>http://software.monolix.org/sdoms/software/index.php?/Forum/Category-30/632-Installation-on-OS-X-and-Matlab2009b.html#789</link>
            <description>Sorry, file now attached. http://software.monolix.org/sdoms/software/images/fbfiles/files/log.txt</description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:18:06 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Subject: Sequential Independent Zero- and First-Order Model - by: thuy</title>
            <link>http://software.monolix.org/sdoms/software/index.php?/Forum/Category-26/694-Sequential-Independent-Zero-and-First-Order-Model.html#786</link>
            <description>Hello Monolix users,

I would like to implement a parallel first order absorption model (similar to this problem that Julie worked on a while ago). However, I have multiple dose data (as well as single dose), SC and IV. Can someone let me know if this is doable in Monolix? If you have an example for me to follow, I'd greatly appreciate it. 

Thank you in advance,
-Thuy</description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 01:25:05 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Subject: Creating a data file - by: Obelix</title>
            <link>http://software.monolix.org/sdoms/software/index.php?/Forum/Category-38/781-Creating-a-data-file.html#784</link>
            <description>Hi Hector

I solved my problem. I separated the columns by the tab-button
only and everything works fine now. 

Thanks for your support!</description>
            <pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:18:21 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Subject: first order oral administration - by: YuriKh</title>
            <link>http://software.monolix.org/sdoms/software/index.php?/Forum/Category-26/778-first-order-oral-administration.html#780</link>
            <description>Dear Hector,
Thank you very much for the reply. I removed the term D*KADMI*exp(-KADMI*max(T-t_dose,0)), but the descrepancy with Matlab code persists.

I found that introducing the term D*ka*exp(-ka*max(T-t_dose,0)) without $PK section does not numerical problems; this way coinsides with Matlab simulations vey good. The problem is rather with $PK section and KA1=ka term without D*ka*exp(-ka*max(T-t_dose,0)). This way leads to the discrepancies with Matlab and I do not understand why. 

The following model coinsides with independent simulations:

$PROBLEM First order absorption with one compartment and induction; parameters: ka, V1, Q, V2, Cl

$MODEL


$PSI ka Cl V1 max_ind induc deg 

$DOSE t_dose D

$ODE
A_0(2)=0
STIFF

DADT(1) = -(Cl*max(0,(1+A(2)))/V1)*A(1)+D*ka*exp(-ka*max(T-t_dose,0)) 
DADT(2) = induc*max(0,max_ind-abs(A(2)))*A(1)/V1-deg*A(2)

$OUTPUT
OUTPUT1 = A(1)/V1

The alternative model slightly differs from Matlab simulation:

$PROBLEM First order absorption with one compartment and induction; parameters: ka, V1, Q, V2, Cl

$MODEL


$PSI ka Cl V1 max_ind induc deg 

$PK
KA1 = ka


$ODE
A_0(2)=0
STIFF

DADT(1) = -(Cl*max(0,(1+A(2)))/V1)*A(1)
DADT(2) = induc*max(0,max_ind-abs(A(2)))*A(1)/V1-deg*A(2)

$OUTPUT
OUTPUT1 = A(1)/V1

Yuri</description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:28:25 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Subject: Importing NONMEM models - by: Hector Mesa</title>
            <link>http://software.monolix.org/sdoms/software/index.php?/Forum/Category-40/776-Importing-NONMEM-models.html#777</link>
            <description>Hi,
  In monolix, you only write in MLXTRAN the model, not the whole project as in NONMEM.In this case, the sections $DATA, $INPUT, $THETA, etc are chosen in the interface. You can find some examples on how to write you own model and how to define your parameters ($PSI section), regression variables ($REG) and on how monolix handle doses. 
  You must know that in monolix, we make a difference between covariates (used in the covariate model to define the way the individual parameters are computed),which can not change on time except for IOV studies where it can be different between (but not within) occasions; and the regression variables that are passed directly to the model.
  In this case, I think that you should set WT and HT as &quot;X&quot; so you can compute BSA and LBM inside the model. For AGE, you can use it as covariate by transforming it as AGE-53.
  Also, you will need to include the differential equations ($ODE section for monolix)
  Best regards,
    Hector Mesa</description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:07:43 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Subject: Unalble to load project from evaulation folder - by: bkoplowitz</title>
            <link>http://software.monolix.org/sdoms/software/index.php?/Forum/Category-32/775-Unalble-to-load-project-from-evaulation-folder.html#775</link>
            <description>Hi,

I’ve been trying to rerun the evaluation of Monolix on my computer and compare it to the results that that you have so kindly documented (RESULTS_EVAL_PK.pdf). I have no problem when loading the data files such as bolus_1cpt_VCL_SD_data.txt and running the appropriate model but I am unable to load a project such as bolus_1cpt_VCL_SD_projct.mat. I am able to load projects from the demo folder and my own folder the problem only occurs with the projects from the evaluation folder. I am running Monolix 3.1R for Windows StandAlone version.


Thanks very much,
Barry</description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 18:33:00 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>